Mathis Bondaz vs Maik Steiner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Nov at 09:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Bondaz vs M. Steiner

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Bondaz 0 - 1 Steiner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mathis Bondaz winning 0 and Maik Steiner winning 2. The last match between Maik Steiner and Mathis Bondaz was at the M25 East Lansing, 04-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Maik Steiner getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bondaz | 0 |
| Steiner | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 East Lansing(11-04-25)
M. Bondaz vs M. Steiner H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.85% (21-18) | Career Total W/L | 57.26% (213-159) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Bondaz vs M. Steiner Match Preview:
- In recent second serve performance, Mathis Bondaz has won 40% of points, compared to Maik Steiner's 43.58%. Does this give Steiner a slight edge in serve game efficiency?
- When it comes to returning, Bondaz has a slight advantage, winning 46.74% of opponents' second serve points against Steiner's 46.71%. Is this marginal difference significant in this context?
- For first serve returns, Bondaz again has an upper hand, claiming 33.07% of points compared to Steiner's 30.36%. Could this indicate a critical advantage for Bondaz in breaking serves?
- Under pressure, with breakpoints saved, Steiner outperforms Bondaz by saving 53.54% compared to Bondaz's 44.54%. Does this resilience suggest Steiner may have a mental toughness advantage?
- Overall match performance over the last year shows Bondaz winning 66.67% of his matches, far ahead of Steiner's 37.78%. Could Bondaz's consistency point to him being the overall favorite?
- Surface preference shows Bondaz excels on hard courts with a 65% win rate, while Steiner is strongest on clay with the same win rate. Will the match surface play a decisive role?
- In terms of player level, Bondaz has been more successful, winning 70% of his ITF $10K matches compared to Steiner's 38.89%. Does this higher success rate imply that Bondaz is better prepared?
- When considering opponent quality, Bondaz has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 24.19, significantly ahead of Steiner's 502.8. Could this experience against higher-ranked players give Bondaz an advantage?
- In deciding sets, Bondaz has emerged victorious in 60% of those matches over the past year, contrasting with Steiner's 43%. Might this give Bondaz a psychological edge in tight matches?
Editorial Prediction (November 4, 2025, UTC):
Mathis Bondaz and Maik Steiner present an intriguing matchup, with both players showing strengths in different areas. However, key statistics provide a glimpse into who might have the upper hand in this encounter.
Bondaz's recent second serve return points and first serve return points slightly outpace Steiner, suggesting a potential edge in breaking serves. Although Steiner shows greater breakpoint resilience, Bondaz's higher overall match win percentage indicates a steadier hand in match play.
Moreover, Bondaz's experience against higher-ranked opponents and his superior win rate in deciding sets strengthen his case as a likely winner. While surface preferences could play a role, if the match isn't held on clay, where Steiner excels, Bondaz's performance on hard courts could prove advantageous.
Considering all factors and recent dynamics, Mathis Bondaz is the likely candidate to triumph in the forthcoming tennis match against Maik Steiner.
Mathis Bondaz vs Maik Steiner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Bondaz vs M. Steiner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:58:46 | Average Match Time | 1:58:46 |
| 61% (43/71) | 1st Serve % | 54% (41/76) |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 29% (8/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 25% (2/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 42% (32/76) | Return Points Win % | 48% (34/71) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Bondaz Recent Matches Played
M. Steiner Recent Matches Played

M. Bondaz vs M. Steiner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.85% (21/18) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.26% (213/159) |
| 52.94% (45/40) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.46% (485/359) |
| 52.75% (413/370) | Games Win/Loss | 53.95% (4347/3710) |
| 65.22% (15/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.34% (82/61) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.77% (124/87) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 35 | Aces Total | 833 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 88 | Total Double Faults | 603 |
| 1:13:44 | Average Match Time | 1:9:47 |
| 410.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 346.84 |
| 61% (1033/1706) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10110/16676) |
| 59% (614/1033) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6832/10110) |
| 47% (318/673) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3327/6566) |
| 44% (101/231) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (725/1681) |
| 44% (808/1830) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6737/16791) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 55.26% (21/17) | Futures W/L | 58.10% (208/150) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (212/371) |
| 40% (2/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (47/90) |
| 50% (4/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (41/101) |
| 86% (22/19) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (221/196) |
| 14% (22/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (221/25) |
| 6% (17/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (151/17) |